Posts Tagged ‘Immigration’

Government Contractors Face Debarment for Unlawful Employment Practices

Monday, September 15th, 2008

The USCIS has recently notified 7 companies that they face debarment because each has been found to be unlawfully employing persons without employment authorization.  The FAR explicitly provides that contractors may be considered for debarment if they knowingly hire an unauthorized worker or continue to employ an alien who becomes unauthorized. 

(more…)

USCIS Reverses Position On Revised Form I-9

Monday, July 7th, 2008

The 6/5/07 revision of Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) has been restored as the correct version of the form to use.  This revision reverses the USCIS announcement on June 16, 2008 of a new Form I-9 version, dated 6/16/08, to reflect a one year extension of the OMB control number.   The correct “restored” form may be found at the following link:

http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-9.pdf

(more…)

USCIC Issues New Form I-9

Monday, June 30th, 2008

UPDATED:  See new post regarding USCIC’s decision to rescind new form here.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently issued a new I-9 Form containing a revision date of “06/16/08″ at the lower right corner of the form and an expiration date of 06/30/09 at the upper right corner of the form.  There is no substantive change between the old I-9 Form and the new I-9 Form, the form simply bears a new revision and expiration date.

(more…)

New USCIS Rule Prohibits Multiple H1-B Filings

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

The USCIS announced on March 19, 2008, a new interim rule that prohibits employers from filing multiple H1-B applications for the same candidate.  The 27-page Federal Register announcement of the new rule can be found here.

(more…)

Virginia Bill Would Allow Employers To Fire Employees Who Do Not Speak English

Thursday, January 17th, 2008

The Washington Post reports today that “a Republican state senator from Fairfax County [Virginia] has introduced a proposal that would allow a boss to fire employees who don’t speak English in the workplace, which would make them ineligible for unemployment benefits.”  The bill was introduced ostensibly to protect employers from increased unemployment tax assessments in such cases.  Even if the measure passes, the decision to terminate the employee would still have to pass muster with the EEOC (if challenged).   The EEOC takes the position that a blanket English-only rule is discriminatory.

(more…)